In a nutshell, we can say that: the Arabian Gulf, the product has oil, not buy only its needs from Europe, but (hiring) funds have more than is buying them and invested in them, but to clear tracking numbers issued by the Office of the European Statistics (Eurostat (2) ) In any case, reports of well-known and published widely, the figures showed that foreign direct investment by Member States of the Gulf Cooperation Council, the European Union, jumped to 63.2 billion euros in 2008, compared to 2.3 billion euros in 2007, while the European direct investment recorded in the GCC countries has increased, it did not reach only to 18.9 billion euros in 2008, compared to 4.6 billion euros in 2007, that the difference (in general) in the interest of Europe is 44.3 billion euros. The biggest investments in the GCC countries in the EU share of Luxembourg (one of the Benelux countries: 455 thousand people, to the figures of 2004), amounting to 59.3 billion euros, or about 30% of the value of foreign capital pumps in direct investment in Europe, and the State of United Arab Emirates the largest share of this amount as the value of its investments 58.5 billion euros, followed by Qatar with a value of 641 million euros, and Saudi Arabia $ 134 million euros and 110 million euros Bahrain, Kuwait $ 23 million euros. According to the report, as well as, the flows of foreign direct investment from outside the European Union that would have recorded a further decline to no investment and the Cooperation Council for the Arab Gulf States in Luxembourg, note that the investments the GCC countries in Europe have always been the top hit 31.8% of the Total inflows of FDI into the European Union in 2008, occupies this second place in the bloc, while the value of investments in North America (Canada and United States) in the European Union 65.8 billion euros, which is similar to 33.1% of the total flows of foreign direct investment in the bloc, What is the direction of the (Gulf Arab money) pump in Europe? But before we go with the report to know where to turn the money the oil, we need to remove the confusion in connection with the idea of drop in the surplus value in this context; It is clear that Gulf oil is not only that the pumping of surplus value to the outside, but share in that parts of the developed (United States, and Canada) Does this mean that those parts (the United States, and Canada) is the backward parts? Taking phenomena, yes!! Which did not, and will not, move it at all. The similarity of leakage with the nature of underdevelopment is subject to the same leakage. Valojza advanced pumping of surplus value produced internally in the pores of the global economy, starting from the case of saturation of an internal and a desire to influence at the global level, as the whole world is the field work of the capital of the parts developed, When the pump parts developed surplus value in the pores of the global economy, for he is simply the a process of renewal of production in a wide range, while this drop in the parts of the underdeveloped as a result of deficiency, while this drop in the countries of the Gulf oil a different nature, there is a dominance nor is Oz, but due to a lack of turning surplus so far to top money, and here we say metaphorically (leakage of surplus value) and a metaphor because the oil sector is the productive sector only in those parts of the oil of the world, at the expense of the rest of the branches of production, and then distort the economic structure Baktaath three (agriculture, industry and trade) drop in the surplus value If a synonym of backwardness should be linked to the analysis of the nature of the leak itself, if the leak in order to need and poor production, lack of basic products, counting synonymous with backwardness and focused aspects of treatment at work to prevent it, but for capital accumulation is possible to control the terms of renewal of production, then we the process of "leakage technical sense," which we mean, in the case out of the same value of excess parts of saturated to accumulate and heavy production, and is working to consolidate and set always in the market competition monopoly on the world stage, and lack the basic products, we are in the process, "Pumping of surplus value," which What do the developed parts of saturated capital accumulator five centuries ago. Let us return to the report, so get to know the general direction of the value of the excess "fleeing away from the peoples" of the oil states abroad, the report did not say what the sectors that received the (money), but that there was a hint clearer than the statement, described the report of Luxembourg, in the same context, as renumbered (a financial center and a bank), regardless of in Europe, which probably means that the European side is the one who Isthoz on (money Gulf oil) after the filing of Banks in Luxembourg, and then became the European side under his hand now (money) where mourners how he wants, and all that The pay is the benefits of deposit. This means that Europe may Isthozat on the amount of (cash) a particular, but not (60) billion euros; which represents about 32% of the total flows of foreign direct investment, in 2008, meaning that there is an infiltration of (60) billion euros, It also means that Europe has become has now re-injected, and recycling (60) billion euros, which produced (Petrolitarya (88) Arabian Gulf), but, because the official theory does not care about the issue of leakage of that, you will not be necessary, from the point of view, discussion of underdevelopment as a leak in the surplus value produced internally to the outside of the national economy, towards the pores of the parts of the developed capitalist world economy today, what is it that says its dominant theory formally and academically?
No comments:
Post a Comment